CPO Design LTD
Consultancy services

Technology Consultancy That Gets You Unstuck

Get a expert in field where your business neeeds legup

We help leadership teams diagnose architectural risk, unblock delivery and define practical next steps across cloud, software, AI and integration.

Get a Technology AssessmentTalk to an Expert

Buyer paths

  • I need an architecture review
  • I need to rescue a project
  • I need Azure expertise
  • I need engineering capacity
  • I need an independent technical opinion
  • I need technology due diligence

Core advisory areas

Architecture, Azure/cloud, software modernisation, technical debt, project rescue, delivery leadership, AI strategy, APIs/integration and technical due diligence.

Productised consultancy offers

Architecture Health Check

Indicative: £995–£2,500

Architecture assessment, risk review, technical debt insights, security and scalability priorities, and a 90-day roadmap.

Pricing note: Indicative bands shown for discovery purposes. Final commercial scope is confirmed during client-led statement-of-work approval.

Technology Strategy Review

Indicative: £2,500–£7,500

Stakeholder interviews, architecture and delivery review, infrastructure checks, and practical technical roadmap.

Pricing note: Indicative bands shown for discovery purposes. Final commercial scope is confirmed during client-led statement-of-work approval.

Project Rescue Assessment

Indicative: £3,000–£10,000+

Project health, delivery risks, technical blockers and a structured recovery plan.

Pricing note: Indicative bands shown for discovery purposes. Final commercial scope is confirmed during client-led statement-of-work approval.

Technology Due Diligence

Indicative: £5,000–£25,000+

Independent diligence covering architecture, code, infrastructure, security, scalability and operational risks.

Pricing note: Indicative bands shown for discovery purposes. Final commercial scope is confirmed during client-led statement-of-work approval.

Trust and next step

We prioritise business outcomes, transparent delivery governance and clear communication with technical and commercial stakeholders.

Client-verification status: Pending named-client and metric approval.
Claim scope: Named case studies, testimonials and quantitative outcomes for consultancy services.
Evidence basis: Published proof currently consists of anonymised testimonial statements, service scope and methodology content.

Review technical insights
Client evidence

Case-study evidence available for service decisions

These case snapshots use only existing in-repo testimonial statements. Client identities and unpublished metrics remain intentionally redacted until approved.

Confidential enterprise client

Challenge: Software delivery reliability across supported platforms needed improvement.

What is evidenced: Container-focused delivery approach used to improve cross-platform reliability.

Evidence quote: “Your visionary approach to software delivery using containers has truly revolutionized our systems. Thanks to your expertise, we now have reliable software across all supported platforms.”

Verification status: Quote-level evidence published; client name and quantitative outcomes withheld pending client approval.
Evidence source: Legacy testimonial copy already published in site repository

Related solution pathway

Confidential delivery client

Challenge: Website delivery required an implementation approach that reduced execution friction.

What is evidenced: Containerized architecture delivery support applied for a smooth rollout experience.

Evidence quote: “I'm grateful for the team's exceptional work in delivering our website with containerized architecture. They made the process effortless with their expertise and attention to detail.”

Verification status: Quote-level evidence published; named reference and metrics not published.
Evidence source: Legacy testimonial copy already published in site repository

Related solution pathway

Confidential global programme client

Challenge: Large application rollout required schedule discipline and cross-region delivery control.

What is evidenced: Azure-aligned global application delivery completed within agreed schedule and budget.

Evidence quote: “I am pleased to offer my highest commendation to the team responsible for the delivery of our application across multiple continents and Azure, which was completed on time and within budget.”

Verification status: Quote-level evidence published; independent commercial verification and named client disclosure pending.
Evidence source: Legacy testimonial copy already published in site repository

Related solution pathway
Trust architecture

Service delivery trust architecture

Methodology

Diagnose current-state risks, prioritise outcomes, define pragmatic options, and execute in measurable phases.

Engagement process

Discovery call, focused technical assessment, recommendation pack, and optional execution support.

Delivery governance

Decision log, risk tracking, milestone checkpoints, and stakeholder-ready status reporting.

Assurance and credentials

Only currently verifiable claims are published. Any pending certifications or named references are explicitly marked as awaiting client verification.

Proof pathways: review technical insights, explore solution pathways, run the technology assessment, or request a scoped review.